From 9 November 2023, changes to the Australian Consumer Law now ban proposing, using, or relying on unfair contract terms in standard form contracts with consumers and small businesses.
Prior to this a Court could only declare specific terms of a contract unfair and therefore void but they were not prohibited, and the Court could impose any penalties. As of Nov 2023, Courts can impose substantial penalties on businesses and individuals who include unfair terms in their standard form contracts.
The maximum financial penalties for businesses under the new unfair contract terms law are the greater of:
- $50,000,000;
- three times the value of the “reasonably attributable” benefit obtained from the conduct, if the court can determine this; or
- if a court cannot determine the benefit, 30 per cent of adjusted turnover during the breach period.
The maximum penalty for an individual is $2.5 million.
The changes apply to:
- standard form contracts made or renewed on or after 9 November 2023.
- a term of a standard form contract that is varied or added on or after 9 November 2023.
Where a term of a contract is varied or added on or after 9 November 2023, the changes relevant to deciding whether a contract is a standard form contract apply to the whole contract.
The definition of a small business contract also changed. The protections now cover businesses with 100 or fewer employees or that make less than $10 million in annual turnover and apply irrespective of the value of the contract.
ACCC has also provided extensive information on what this means in your contract negotiations and how to bring this to the attention of processors. There is a whole website HERE and a handy printable guidance note Unfair contact terms practical tips for businesses
NOTE THAT ALL POULTRY MEET GROWING CONTRACTS ARE CONSIDERED TO BE “STANDARD FORM” CONTRACTS
Latest Information
CHANGES TO NATIONAL ANIMAL WELFARE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES – TIME FOR ACTION
NATIONAL FEDERAL ANIMAL WELFARE GUIDELINES are the legal guidelines which every grower in Australia has to meet. These Guidelines may be captured in legislation on a state by state basis – most states do, some states modify them slightly. Importantly, the RSPCA, ACMF and other key groups sit on the panel which develops the National […]
read moreRSPCA RISKS ENTIRE MEAT POULTRY INDUSTRY
The RSPCA is choosing to risk the health and safety of the entire meat poultry industry right across Australia with its current Accreditation (and proposed future replacement, Certification) scheme in three ways: 1. The Current Scheme ACGC has discovered that RSPCA is so intent on litter health that farmers are having to rotary hoe their […]
read moreLocal Avian Influenza Outbreak Sparks Review of Biosecurity Agreement
In the wake of the H7 “local” Avian Influenza outbreaks in Vic, NSW and ACT, there has been a rush of bureaucratic survey-taking, and requests for input and opinion, all hoping that meat poultry growers tell government departments how wonderfully they handled the outbreak. Sadly, they are receiving the truth: the good, the bad and […]
read more